In the last 30 days I’ve had a lot of conversations, emails,
academic assessment, and observations in order to prepare for the IEP. Here are
some things that I’ve learned.
Parent Observation and IDEA
The school had a policy of not allowing parents to
participate in their own children’s classrooms. They felt that it would be too
distracting for students. I wanted to respect the wishes of the school community
but I felt this rule worked against the spirit of IDEA and my right as a parent
to be involved in the IEP process. To be fully included and active
participants, I needed to observe Sweet Pea in her classroom in order to make
informed decisions about goals and any accommodations that needed to be made on
her behalf. Thankfully, they consented without much issue and since the IEP
they have changed their policy to allow parents to volunteer in their own
children’s classrooms. Yay!
WIAT Achievement Test
I visited with a child psychologist this summer to get
advice on when and how best to screen for learning disabilities. She
recommended Sweet Pea take the WIAT achievement test annually and a cognitive test every three years. When
combined, they can help to identify a learning disability. When I sat down with
Sweet Pea’s RSP teacher she told me they conduct the WIAT for all their
students right before their annual IEP. For Sweet Pea that would be in the
spring. I felt spring time was too late in the event we could identify issues
she needed to work through – the team could develop a strategy to support her
learning earlier in the year instead of the spring when there’s only 2 months
left of school. The downside of doing it at the beginning of the year is the
possibility of Sweet Pea regressing over the summer time and not performing as
well as she should. I personally don’t think this is an issue so we went ahead
and had her assessed before our first IEP.
The results weren’t that surprising to me. I wanted to make
sure the team understood that Sweet Pea works really really hard at academics
but progress is slower due to the fact of her speech and fine motor delays. My
husband and I do not believe that the academic assessment correlates to her
cognitive abilities and have every expectation that she do chronological age appropriate
work with as many accommodations as she needs.
Montessori Teacher Credential
The Montessori teachers at our school did not have enough
preparation for children with special needs (this is my subjective opinion) and
are not required to learn about IDEA, FAPE or what an IEP is. Or at least
that’s been my experience so far. The charter school does have a third service
provider that is responsible for providing special education services but I
don’t believe this goes far enough. If Montessori teacher credentialing
programs really want to make Montessori accessible to ALL children, they should
include a course about children with special needs and their right to a free
and appropriate education in the least restrictive environment.
Limitations of the Montessori Classroom and the Child with Special Needs
I met with Sweet Pea’s service providers and chatted about
the accommodations she would need to access the learning environment. Some of the
accommodations are pretty straightforward like a step stool to be used under
her feet for stability while writing. Some Montessori classrooms do not have
chairs and tables. Instead children work at low tables and on the ground –
that’s not the case at our school thankfully. So yes, Sweet Pea needs the
support of a table and chair for writing. ;-) A clipboard for her visual task
list and small pencils. Since the Montessori materials are multi-sensory, we
all wondered if any other accommodations needed to be made. Well….after
observing Sweet Pea in the classroom, I decided that she does need additional
support. Turns out Sweet Pea was not engaging with the reading, writing, and language
materials. I believe she does have a lot of interest and motivation in these
areas but she requires a LOT of 1 to 1 instruction and support (prompts)
especially when using her journal, conducting investigation and research.
I believe that her Montessori teachers may have misinterpreted
her behavior as her not being interested (or intrinsically motivated) and would
prefer to see her behave as if a typically developing child with no risk for
learning disabilities would engage with the materials.
Here is a video clip about intrinsic motivation and
leveraging natural interests.
So my question for the Montessori folks – what happens when
the child has the intrinsic motivation from a cognitive level but doesn’t have
the speech and fine motor skills to match their cognitive abilities? When it
comes to the engilsh language arts materials, I think you’ll find that children
with language disabilities might act out and are frustrated…or they simply
disengage. They may not ask for help because they simply can’t say the words. Montessori
teachers may misinterpret this behavior as not being intrinsically motivated
when in fact students like Sweet Pea benefit from intense 1 to 1 instruction
with a plan to help students learn independently with the materials.
In terms of group instruction like following directions when
transitioning activities or during circle time, children with special needs may
need some extra supports. For Sweet Pea, I would like to see the use of way
more visual aids and physical items the kids can touch (pass around). While
sweet pea does follow multi-step directions she does get very distracted with
unrelated visual stimulus. If the teachers use related visual stimuli
then I think Sweet Pea will be extremely engaged for longer periods of time.
The Offer of Services
I believe Sweet Pea is getting the appropriate level of
speech, OT, RSP, and aide services to help her access the Montessori learning
environment. She is in general ed 90% of the time and 10% out of class. Services are pushed in as much as possible. Sweet Pea is developing and happy in this model of learning. Yay!
The greatest challenge is for the team to work together in order for her to progress academically and socially. In the IEP meeting I asked a lot of questions about they way service providers communicate with classroom teachers and vice versa. We set up a few strategies so that everyone can share best practices and be on the same page. So I think the team is on the road to working together more instead of in isolation of each other.
Emotionally Sweet Pea's a happy kid and as long as she stays that way, I think she is on the right path.
The greatest challenge is for the team to work together in order for her to progress academically and socially. In the IEP meeting I asked a lot of questions about they way service providers communicate with classroom teachers and vice versa. We set up a few strategies so that everyone can share best practices and be on the same page. So I think the team is on the road to working together more instead of in isolation of each other.
Emotionally Sweet Pea's a happy kid and as long as she stays that way, I think she is on the right path.
Other Inclusion Challenges
I have mixed emotions socializing with the other parents at
the school. I feel so much more alone than I did when Sweet Pea was in a
special day class. I never had to explain myself or how I felt with other SDC
parents. We had common experiences and that helped to develop a shared
understanding. I felt normal…
But now, I hide so much of my complex feelings now that
Sweet Pea is in an inclusive environment. My feelings are secrets – not because I’m
ashamed but because typical parents have deeply rooted anger and fears about
children with special needs. We don’t have a common understanding and I don’t let
them know that I think and feel different. Normalcy is nowhere to be found for
me at the inclusive school but the upside is – normalcy is found for Sweet Pea
in her classroom, at art and music class, and with her Mandarin teacher. That’s
what’s important.
Hope Blooms Here!
No comments:
Post a Comment